I have been reading a very interesting book. A mark of a Man is the name of the book. The first 100 pages of the book is mainly a discusion about masculinity or gender roles. Their is a big movement towards "egalitarianism". First off the word is a word that tends to paint a negative character on the traditional and correct interpetation of scripture that is hieraical (men and women are equal in being but have different and distinct roles). The term thats root means equal seems good. I would say that to hold to anything except that men (in a sexual sense) and women (in a sexual sense) are not distinct in roles is wrong and results in negative things.
The man in a marriage relationship is the head of the woman his wife. This headship denotes authority within the marriage. The authority is carried out in love. This is modeled to us by Christ the head of his church. Christ has the authority over his church. A Biblical example of this is found in Revelation 1-3 in the letters to the churches. Their Christ is acting as the head. The analogy of the head (man/Christ) and body (woman/Church) is found in the Ephesians chapter five.
The Egalitarians say that everyone is to be submissive to each other thus eliminatting the role of men and women in the family. Some egalitarians will say that a man may even be submissive to his wife through sacrificial love. Strange how the Bible does not come to that conclusion when it says that the wife is submissive to her husband and husbands likewise are to love their wife as Christ loved the Chruch and gave himself up for her. There sacrificial love is not seen as submission. However that is not the total purpose of this posting to argue over the interpetation of the scriptures. The purpose is to show the results of such a philosophy that comes when one departs from God's sexual roles.
When a man and a woman are seen as interchangable in their roles in that a man could be submissive to a woman in a marriage. This view of sexuality results in feminism. The feminist see gender roles as evil in that if a woman's role is to be submissive then she is inferior to the man. This is never the conclusion of the Bible. The Bible simply says that God set up society to be a certian way and that the gender roles are the way life should be lived. The denial of specific gender roles also open up the possiblity of homosexual marriage.
If marriage does not have to have a male at the head then why does it need to have a woman as the submissive member of the marriage? It does not is the conclusion. So homosexuals are taking the same reasoning that their is no specific gender role in marriage and creating a fake marriage of two men or two women. No longer is one man and one woman needed to fill the requirements of the gender roles of a marriage after all they are mere societal norms not truths. See how far you can go when you start to move outside the roles and ways God set things up. Well I could go on but I think that you can look around society and see this philosophy in work from clothes to dating attitudes ect...
Tim